The Program in World Philology | Timbuktu and the Best Friends of the Philologist: A Conversation with Shamil Jeppie

However we define philology it always entails some understanding of the contexts in which texts are produced and in which they circulate/d. In this lecture I shall examine some of the practices that often shape such contexts through looking at the place of manuscripts as they travel from a writer’s working space into collections. Such collections are never stable but grow or disintegrate and in attempting to re-constitute a work from disparate manuscript copies the micro-histories of manuscript movements have to be taken into account. Working in Timbuktu’s manuscript libraries we have found the limitations of working solely from published texts and catalogues and similar scholarly apparatuses. Working with local scholars and library owners – often the same people involved in producing the catalogues – sheds new light on the trajectories of manuscripts and collections. Such information can often be contradictory but crucial to understanding contexts when undertaking a philological project. These local colleagues and their insights should be the philologist’s best friends. The history of West Africa – and Timbuktu having come to stand in as a sign of that region’s scholarly traditions – as a site for potential philological projects should take into account a larger set of practices and locally embedded knowledge around (manuscript) book learning, making, and collecting.











When: Mon., Nov. 14, 2016 at 5:00 pm - 7:00 pm
Where: Columbia University
116th St. & Broadway
212-854-1754
Price: Free
Buy tickets/get more info now
See other events in these categories:

However we define philology it always entails some understanding of the contexts in which texts are produced and in which they circulate/d. In this lecture I shall examine some of the practices that often shape such contexts through looking at the place of manuscripts as they travel from a writer’s working space into collections. Such collections are never stable but grow or disintegrate and in attempting to re-constitute a work from disparate manuscript copies the micro-histories of manuscript movements have to be taken into account. Working in Timbuktu’s manuscript libraries we have found the limitations of working solely from published texts and catalogues and similar scholarly apparatuses. Working with local scholars and library owners – often the same people involved in producing the catalogues – sheds new light on the trajectories of manuscripts and collections. Such information can often be contradictory but crucial to understanding contexts when undertaking a philological project. These local colleagues and their insights should be the philologist’s best friends. The history of West Africa – and Timbuktu having come to stand in as a sign of that region’s scholarly traditions – as a site for potential philological projects should take into account a larger set of practices and locally embedded knowledge around (manuscript) book learning, making, and collecting.

Buy tickets/get more info now