Hostile Architecture vs. Democratic Design for the Future

Experts discuss how public spaces - parks, plazas, and buildings - can be more welcoming to the public.

Many new buildings and public spaces in New York City have been criticized for being hostile to the public. In fact, “hostile architecture” is a term used by the media to describe an increasing feature in public spaces; for example, benches with multiple arms to deter sleeping and limit use by homeless people. How can city spaces be more democratic and inclusive, while also providing public safety? A panel of experts discusses the design of new developments, parks, plazas, and buildings, analyzing successes and failures, with an eye towards what the public should demand in the future.

Featuring Marta Gutman, dean and professor at the Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of Architecture at The City College of New York; Michael Kimmelman, architecture critic at The New York Times; Setha Low, distinguished professor of Psychology, Anthropology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, and Women's and Gender Studies at the CUNY Graduate Center; Tamar Renaud, the New York State director at Trust for Public Land; and others.

Presented with the Ph.D. Program in Anthropology, the Ph.D. Program in Earth and Environmental Sciences, the Public Space Research Group, and the Bernard and Anne Spitzer School of Architecture at The City College of New York.