National Security vs. Privacy: The Real Inside Story of The Pentagon Papers
Published by The New York Times in 1971, The Pentagon Papers divided an already deeply fractured nation with startling and disturbing revelations about the United States’ involvement in Vietnam. The Washington Post called them “the most significant leaks of classified material in American history” and they remain relevant today as a reminder of the importance of a free press. Indeed, they are a focal point of The Post, a new film by Steven Spielberg about that era.
This timely class will focus on how the necessity to ensure national security must be reconciled with the rights guaranteed in the First Amendment – a democratic dilemma that continues to demand public attention. That challenge certainly reached a flashpoint when the press leaked the Pentagon Papers, a top-secret account of the origins of the Vietnam War – while it was still raging.
No constitutional case in American history became more urgent or more important in testing how free the media were (or are) in revealing to the citizenry what the U.S. government intended, while pursuing a war, to keep secret. Nearly five decades later, the political and legal issues that the episode exposed deserve to be pondered and evaluated again.
Stephen Whitfield / Brandeis University
Stephen Whitfield is an American Studies professor at Brandeis University. Has has won several teaching awards including the Samuel Proctor Award for Distinguished Scholarship, the Brandeis Student Union Teaching Award, and the Louis Dembitz Brandeis Prize for Excellence in Teaching.
440 W 57th St
New York, NY 10019